My algo has a 1.70 Sharpe after 84 days live — but 0 copiers. Sharing the full equity curve so someone can tell me what I'm doing wrong

I've been quietly operating a spot algo on Binance since early March — actual money, no paper buying and selling — and after 84 days I'm making an attempt to know why I've zero copiers despite metrics that I assumed would stand out. Posting the complete screenshot as a result of I genuinely want feedback, not validation.

The strategy is a dynamic ATR grid with a circuit breaker that mechanically halts new purchase orders during sharp drops to protect capital. Hosted on AWS Tokyo for latency reasons.

90-day reside results:
– ROI: +16.39% (PnL: +$84.83)
– Sharpe Ratio: 1.70
– Max Drawdown: 13.11%
– Win Price: 79.52% — 66 of 84 days inexperienced

The thing I find most fascinating in that fairness curve is the March–April period. You possibly can see the drawdown line spike when the market dropped, then the bot paused buys, and it recovered to new highs by late Might without any guide intervention. The circuit breaker did precisely what it was designed to do.

For context: a Sharpe of 1.0 is extensively thought-about "good" for an lively technique. Most retail algo merchants I see posting listed here are proud of 0.7–zero.9 on backtests. This is 1.70 on a reside account with real slippage and costs.

And yet — Binance's copy trading algorithm buries me because my lead stability is ~$618. Merchants with $50okay–$100okay and visibly worse drawdowns are featured above me.

Two issues I'm genuinely not sure about:
1. Is there a strategy to make risk-adjusted metrics more seen to potential copiers on platforms like this, or is it purely a capital signaling recreation?
2. Taking a look at my fairness curve — is there something that might make you personally hesitant to repeat this, that I'm not seeing from the within?

Recognize trustworthy takes.